The Combinatorial Structure of Wait-free Solvable Tasks (Extended Abstract)
نویسندگان
چکیده
S be the number of complete (m ?1)-simplexes in K m (colored with f0; : : :; m ? 1g), where the (m ? 1)-simplexes in each m-simplex are considered separately, and counted as +1 or ?1, by their induced orientations. We argue that S = I and S = C. To prove that S = I, consider the following cases. If an (m ? 1)-face is internal, then it contributes 0 to S, since the contributions of the two m-simplexes containing it cancel each other. Obviously, an internal (m ? 1)-face contributes 0 to I. An external (m ? 1)-face in the boundary of K m is counted the same, +1 or ?1 by orientation, in both S and I. Therefore, S = I. To prove that C = S, consider an m-simplex m , and look at the following cases. If m contains two (m?1)-faces which are completely colored, then m is not completely colored and contributes 0 to C. Note that m contributes 0 also to S, since the contributions of the two faces cancel each other. If m contains exactly one (m ? 1)-face which is completely colored (with f0; : : :; m ? 1g), then m must be completely colored and contributes +1 or ?1, by orientation, to C as well as to S. If m does not contain any (m ? 1)-face which is completely colored, then m is not completely colored and therefore, it contributes 0 to C as well as to S. Finally, note that m cannot contain more than two (m ? 1)-faces which are completely colored. We can now derive the oriented version of Sperner's Lemma.
منابع مشابه
Simulating Few by Many : Limited Concurrency = Set Consensus ( Extended
Perfection is the enemy of the good. Most backoff schemes wait until a single contending candidate survives. But it is “the last mile,” getting contention down from few to one, which is usually the most costly: backoff systems which wait on some fixed k > 1 perform better than those that require perfection, i.e. k = 1. This paper asks what tasks are read-write solvable “k-concurrently ” i.e. ta...
متن کاملThree-Processor Tasks Are Undecidable
We show that no algorithm exists for deciding whether a nite task for three or more processors is wait-free solvable in the asyn-chronous read-write shared-memory model. This impossibility result implies that there is no constructive (recursive) characterization of wait-free solvable tasks. It also applies to other shared-memory models of distributed computing, such as the comparison-based model.
متن کاملPredicting Solubility of Isotactic Poly (1-Butene) in Different Organic Solvents by Modified UNIQUAC
The UNIQUAC activity coefficient model is extended to predict solid-liquid equilibrium of isotactic crystalline poly (1-butene), iPBu-1, in different organic solvents. The UNIQUAC activity coefficient model used in this work is based on the concept of group contribution and consists of combinatorial, residual and free volume terms. To account for branching of atom groups in the monomer structur...
متن کاملTeacher Wait-Time and Learner Initiation: A Single Case Analysis
The prevailing pattern of classroom interaction is a tripartite exchange structure known as IRF (teacher initiation, student response, teacher follow-up/feedback; Sinclair & Coulthard, 1975). Although it has its own contributions to classroom discourse, it has been criticized on several grounds, particularly for affording minimum learner participation opportunities (Kasper, 2001). An alternativ...
متن کاملOn the Wait - Free Power of Iterated - Immediate - Snapshots
The Iterated Immediate Snapshot model, introduced recently, has proved its usefulness. Its rich structure provided alternative simple derivation of past results, and its topological equivalence to the Euclidean Unit Simplex provides insights into new problems. Central to the model usefulness is the fact that it was shown to be non-blocking equivalent to the Atomic-Snapshot memory model and as a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- SIAM J. Comput.
دوره 31 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1996